SEARCH
Search Details
CHATANI NaotoGraduate School of Humanities / Division of Human Cultural StudiesProfessor
Research activity information
■ Paper- Jun. 2024, 東北哲学会年報, 40, 69 - 89, Japaneseアリストテレスの倫理学は果たして「倫理学」なのか[Invited]Scientific journal
- Mar. 2021, 神戸大学文学部紀要, 48, 1 - 21Aristotle on self-love and to kalon
- Springer Singapore, Jan. 2021, Risks and Regulation of New Technologies: Kobe University Monograph Series in Social Science Research, 135 - 152, EnglishIn book
- Mar. 2018, 神戸大学文学部紀要, (45) (45), 45 - 64, Japaneseアリストテレス芸術論における快と自然美──「模倣されたもの」の受容による快をめぐってResearch institution
- Mar. 2016, ギリシャ哲学セミナー論集, XIII, 33 - 47アリストテレスにおける動物の目的論をめぐって──部分・必然性・目的論を/が基礎づけるもの──[Invited]Scientific journal
- Mar. 2015, 神戸大学文学部紀要, (42) (42), 1 - 25『リュシス』におけるメネクセノスとリュシスResearch institution
- 日本倫理学会 ; 1952-, Mar. 2014, 倫理学年報, 63(63) (63), 85 - 98, JapaneseThe Pros Hen Structure in Aristotle's Theory of Love[Refereed]Scientific journal
- Jan. 2014, Proceedings of 4th International Conference: Applied Ethics and Applied Philosophy in East Asia, 169 - 177, EnglishAristotle's Virtue Ethics and Applied EthicsInternational conference proceedings
- Kobe University, Mar. 2012, Bulletin of the Faculty of Letters, Kobe University, 39, 1* - 17*, Japanese
- Kobe University, Nov. 2009, philosophia, 第22号、pp.5--70(21) (21), 50 - 70, Japanese『クリトン』におけるクリトン――ソクラテスを理解するための一つの手がかりとしてScientific journal
- Kobe University, Mar. 2009, 神戸大学文学部紀要, 第36号、pp.45-67(36) (36), 45 - 67, Japanese善の帰一性と善のアナロギア――アリストテレス倫理学における善のイデア説批判についてScientific journal
- Mar. 2009, 神戸大学文学部紀要, 第38号、pp.1-16., Japaneseアリストテレスの魂部分論についての一つの視点――『デ・アニマ』と『ニコマコス倫理学』Scientific journal
- 関西哲学会, Jun. 2006, アルケー 関西哲学会年報, 第14号、pp.104-115(14) (14), 104 - 115, Japaneseアリストテレスの心身論におけるテクネーアナロジーと機能主義[Refereed]Scientific journal
- 2005, 愛知, (17) (17), 76 - 84インフォームド・コンセントにおけるナースの役割 ——できること・できないことResearch institution
- In the Metaphysics Θ Aristotle introduces two types of dynamis (dynamis as ability (DA) and dynamis as potentiality (DP)). It has been often pointed out that his distinction between DA and DP is confusing. In this paper, I examine the difference between them and the significance of his detailed explanation of DA in the first half of Θ (ch.1-5), and thereby I show the following.The Philosophical Association of Japan, Apr. 2004, 哲學, 第55号、pp.218-230(55) (55), 218 - 230,30, Japanese
In the first half of Θ, Aristotle basically understands DA as an external (objective) principle of motion. This characterization is neutral with regard to the framework of hylomorphism and whether relevant motion happens or not. But in his criticism against the Megarians who deny dynamis, he indicates that dynamis can be regarded as potentiality. This criticism serves as a point of contact between of ability and potentiality. On the other hand, in the latter half of Θ, the notion of potentiality implies that dynamis is only conceivable as energeia (actuality). However, DA and DP are not exclusive kinds, the difference consists in that of perspective and there is no genuine confusion.
Further, DA plays an important role in introducing DP by analogy. In Θ6, DA functions as the starting point of an analogical argument. That is, there is an analogical progression which proceeds from the scheme ofto that of . In this respect DA has a methodological significance in Aristotle's potentiality-actuality theory. [Refereed]Scientific journal
- Nov. 2019, 神戸新聞われわれの「民主主義」を疑え（21世紀の人文学 神戸大学文学部リレーエッセー）Introduction commerce magazine
- Kobe University, 21 Nov. 2011, 愛知 : φιλοσοφια, (23) (23), 38 - 53, JapaneseEuthyphro in Euthyphro
- Aristotle's Conception of Body (Physikon Soma) in De Anima B1In De Anima B1, Aristotle characterizes body as potentiality, but then he maintains 'homonymy principle,' which means that body is as such only when it is actually living. In this paper, through considering this aporia, I showed the following. i) Potentiality in this context means possibility of continued existence of organism, so it consists with body's actual living. ii) He has two contrasting perspectives about body. According to his thought, body is purely physical, mean while it is virtually identical with soul. iii) These two perspectives being connected, his conception of body is situated at a kind of materialistic line.Hokkaido University, 17 Jul. 2005, Annals of the Philosophical Society of Hokkaido University, 41, 右21 - 右42, Japanese
- Disclosure (or explanation), understanding, and consent (or choice) are essential elements for Informed Consent (IC). But in fact, there are many obstacles on the way to patients' understanding. In this paper, examine what is the suitable way for explanation to promote understanding which can be adequate to be precondition of consent. There have been many discussions about the 'standard' of disclosure up to now, but they can not give an adequate answer to this above-mentioned problem. It is often pointed out that there are two major methods to solve this problem, i.e. avoiding excessive amount of information and promoting suitable interpretation of information. I maintain that, as one of the several ways of explaining to realize the latter, analogical explanation of information is effective. But significance of this way has not been fully pointed out yet. 'Analogy' in this context consists of two factors which doctors select, that is, target and base. The target is a series of information of which doctors intend to inform patients. It is usually medically-specified information, so it is often very difficult for patients to understand. The base is a thing by which doctors intend to explain the target and to make them interpret it properly. The base must be an ordinary and well-known thing for patients, and at the same time it must hold some relation or correspondence to the target. By using such analogy in addition to other ways, doctors' explanation can be helpful to patients' understanding. Moreover, if improper use of analogy is avoided and each patient's autonomy is held, analogy can be used in order that doctors guide patients to choosing the option which they judge to be the most desirable for his or her patient.Japan Association for Bioethics, Sep. 2004, 生命倫理, 14(15) (15), 176 - 183, Japanese[Refereed]Report scientific journal
- Kobe University, 2003, 愛知 : φιλοσοφια, (16) (16), 116 - 131, JapaneseEnergeia and Kinesis in Aristotle's Metaphysics Θ6, 1048b18-35
- Contributor, 6章の「われわれの「民主主義」を疑え」, 神戸大学出版会, Mar. 2023, Japanese, ISBN: 4909364196人文学を解き放つ
- Single work, 晃洋書房, Sep. 2019アリストテレスと目的論──自然・魂・幸福
- Joint work, 春秋社, Nov. 2014, Japanese, ISBN: 9784393323595部分と全体の哲学 : 歴史と現在
- Joint work, 神戸大学, Mar. 2008, Japanese共生の人文学Scholarly book
- 東北哲学会第 73 回大会シンポジウム「アリストテレスと現代」, Oct. 2023, Japaneseアリストテレスの倫理学は果たして「倫理学」なのか?[Invited]Nominated symposium
- 北海道哲学会 2023年度前期研究発表会, Jul. 2023, Japanese「豚の国」と持続可能な社会──プラトン『国家』におけるもう一つの国家論
- 阪神ドイツ文学会 第136回研究発表会 シンポジウム：プネウマ／スピリトゥス／ガイスト ── 概念史点描の試み, Dec. 2021「プシュケー」と「プネウマ」──アリストテレスを中心としてPublic symposium
- The 9th International Conference: Applied Ethics and Comparative Thought in East Asia, May 2019, EnglishEuthanasia and AristotleOral presentation
- Organization for Advanced and Integrated Research MST International Workshop, Mar. 2019, English, International conferenceAristotle and BioethicsNominated symposium
- 日本倫理学会第69回大会, Oct. 2018, Japanese, Domestic conferenceアリストテレス倫理学における魂理解その基礎づけをめぐる一考察Public symposium
- The 7th International Conference of Applied Ethics and Applied Philosophy in East Asia, May 2017, English, Seoul, Korea, International conferenceInformed Consent and AutonomyOral presentation
- The 6th International Conference on Applied Ethics, Oct. 2011, English, Hokkaido University, 札幌市, International conferenceAristotle and the Unity of Bio-Medical EthicsOral presentation
- 日本生命倫理学会第18回大会, Nov. 2006, Japanese, 岡山大学, Domestic conference安楽死法制化以降の現状にみられる諸問題と倫理原則の関わりをめぐってOral presentation
- 日本学術振興会, 科学研究費助成事業, 基盤研究(B), 北海道大学, 01 Apr. 2017 - 31 Mar. 2021アリストテレス倫理学の再定位を通した新たな自然主義的倫理学の構想プロジェクト三年目となる2019年度は、昨年度までと同じくメンバーが各自の研究を進めるとともに、特に国内外での研究成果の発信に力を入れた。まず5月19日に日本哲学会第78回大会（首都大学東京）で、公募ワークショップ「政治的な事柄を〈いま〉哲学するということ：アリストテレス『政治学』を再読する意義の検討を手がかりとして」（オーガナイザー・立花）を行った。本研究メンバーの相澤・稲村に福間聡・玉手慎太郎の両氏を加えた四名の提題を受けて、アリストテレス哲学の現代的意義と時代的制約などをめぐって刺激的な意見交換がなされた。7月7日にはFIEC/CA 2019（ロンドン）で、本研究メンバーの立花・岩田および研究協力者の文景楠・北郷彩によるパネル発表‘Rethinking Nature and Naturalism in Aristotle’s Ethics’が行われ、アリストテレス倫理学における自然概念と自然主義の問題をめぐって多岐に亘る議論が交わされた。その他、本研究に関連する企画として、同じFIEC/CA 2019で7月6日に近藤をオーガナイザーとしてパネル発表が、その準備として5月25日にワークショップ「日本における西洋古典受容」（慶應義塾大学）が、また5月26日には研究協力者の川本愛による研究書の書評会（早稲田大学、本研究メンバーの近藤・稲村のほか安田将・兼利琢也の各氏の協力を得た）が、2月20日には古代哲学ワークショップ（ユトレヒト大学）がそれぞれ開かれた。各自の研究も順調に進められており、2019年度中に発表された主な成果としては、高橋、松浦、研究協力者の文景楠らによる研究論文、茶谷によるアリストテレス研究書、近藤、佐良土による分担執筆論文、および書評会ノートなどがある。
- 日本学術振興会, 科学研究費補助金（基盤研究(C)）, Apr. 2017 - Mar. 2020, Principal investigatorプネウマからガイストへ──古代ギリシアからゲーテにいたる人間三元論の系譜Competitive research funding
- 科学研究費補助金／基盤研究(B), Apr. 2010 - Mar. 2013Competitive research funding
- 科学研究費補助金／若手研究(B), 2010, Principal investigatorCompetitive research funding
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B), Kobe University, 2007 - 2009A research on "Kyodo(homeland)" as geographical and Social thoughtThis research project aimed to examine a representational and material process of an idea of "Kyodo(Heimat, homeland)" in the modern Japan. Our particular research interests revolved around three modalities, (1) how the idea was accepted, (2) how the idea became postulated as a stable entity in nations' geographical imagination, and (3) how various practices for the representation of the "Kyodo" took place and were developed. In so doing, we focused on a relationship between an educational system, molded up by the Ministry of Education, that invented teaching programs and materials to teach pupils geography of their own 'homeland', and other various movements such as developments of folklore and folk craft studies, discussions over a museum display of the localness, and promotion of domestic tourism. We also unveiled how the idea of "Kyodo" contributed to an anchoring of coherent local communities. The research leads us to understand various aspects of the development of the representation of "Kyodo".
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B), Shizuoka University, 2005 - 2007Study on Psyche' in the Ancient Greek PhilosophyOur project has focused on a basic aspect in the ancient Greek philosophy, namely ‘psyche' where the study on Plato and that on Aristotle run across, and aimed to transcend the lint of individual researches on the bases of the each study. Specifically, our targets are to analyze the definitions and functions of psyche in Plato and Aristotle,e.g. to expound 'thoughts', sensations, 'feelings', 'belief',' desire' and 'images', and explain how these are related with bodily organs. Through cooperation in these studies we attempt to deepen our understanding, and clarify points of arguments between Plato and Aristotle, also in contemporary meaning form the viewpoint of the philosophy of mind and the ethics concealed with norms. For these purposes, we have meetings every year Particularly in the year _:- and 2006 we have fruitfully discussed with foreign scholars, especially with professor David Charles (Oriel College, Oxford University). Through these joint studies on psyche we have recognized that the grasp of 'Psyche' made up the test of the ancient Greek ethical thoughts. We have confirmed that the grasp of psyche is decisive in understanding and analyzing the concept of virtue and it raises series of problems which converge in the phase of 'eudaimonia'. So, now, we think of a new joint research-project on the ancient Geek ethical thoughts.
- 科学研究費補助金／若手研究(B), 2005, Principal investigatorCompetitive research funding