Anaplastic thyroid cancer is one of the rarest subtypes of thyroid cancer, accounting for only 1-2% of all thyroid cancer cases. It is also one of the most aggressive: prognosis remains dismal and the disease-specific mortality rate is close to 100%. This rarity has markedly limited the availability of prospective trial results, and no standard chemotherapeutic option for unresectable or metastatic anaplastic thyroid cancer has yet been established. Nevertheless, combination therapy with a BRAF inhibitor and MEK inhibitor has shown encouraging efficacy in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated anaplastic thyroid cancer. Other novel treatments such as immune checkpoint inhibitors have also shown promising results. Owing to these therapeutic advances, the prognosis of anaplastic thyroid cancer appears to be gradually improving. However, further development of novel treatments for this rare malignancy requires the development of substantial infrastructure for international collaborative study.

Background

Platinum and anti-PD-1 antibodies are the front-line systemic therapy for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RM-HNSCC). However, limited data are available on clinical outcomes and appropriate regimens for patients with RM-HNSCC following treatment failure with these agents.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with RM-HNSCC from 10 Japanese institutions in whom platinum and nivolumab treatment failed.

Results

Of the 480 patients included in the study, 236 were treated with the best supportive care and had a median overall survival of 3.1 months. The remaining 244 patients received salvage-line chemotherapy, which was paclitaxel + cetuximab in 72 (30%), paclitaxel or docetaxel in 89 (36%), and tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil in 48 (20%); the respective objective response rates were 54.9%, 27.9%, and 25.5%, with median progression-free survival of 5.4 months and median overall survival of 13.0 months. Multivariable analysis identified disease stabilization or response on prior nivolumab and paclitaxel + cetuximab as salvage-line chemotherapy to be associated with encouraging progression-free and overall survival.

Conclusion

This study sheds light on clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with RM-HNSCC after failure of platinum and anti-PD-1 antibody therapy. The findings provide essential baseline data for future therapeutic development in salvage-line settings.

AIM: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) for salivary gland cancer (SGC) have been investigated in clinical trials, details of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) remain unclear. This research aimed to elucidate the TIME of SGC and its relationship with tumor mutation burden (TMB) and to explore the rationale for the applicability of ICPi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We selected five pathological types, namely adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC); adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified (ANOS); salivary duct carcinoma (SDC); and low/high-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEClow/high). We investigated the TIME and TMB of each pathological type. TIME was evaluated by multiplexed fluorescent immunohistochemistry. TMB was measured by next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: ACC and MEChigh showed the lowest and highest infiltration of immune effector and suppressor cells in both tumor and stroma. ANOS, SDC, and MEClow showed modest infiltration of immune effector cells in tumors. Correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between CD3+CD8+ T cells in tumor and TMB (r = 0.647). CD3+CD8+ T cells in tumors showed a positive correlation with programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression in tumor cells (r = 0.513) and a weak positive correlation with CD3+CD4+Foxp3+ cells in tumors (r = 0.399). However, no correlation was observed between CD3+CD8+ T cells and CD204+ cells in tumors (r = -0.049). CONCLUSION: The TIME of ACC was the so-called immune desert type, which may explain the mechanisms of the poor response to ICPi in previous clinical trials. On the other hand, MEChigh was the immune-inflamed type, and this may support the rationale of ICPi for this pathological subtype.

BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, novel anticancer drugs have improved the prognosis for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (RM-SCCHN). However, this has increased healthcare expenditures and placed a heavy burden on patients and society. This study investigated the frequency of use and costs of select palliative chemotherapy regimens in Japan. METHODS: From July 2021 to June 2022 in 54 healthcare facilities, we gathered data of patients diagnosed with RM-SCCHN and who had started first-line palliative chemotherapy with one of eight commonly used regimens. Patients with nasopharyngeal carcinomas were excluded. The number of patients receiving each regimen and the costs of each regimen for the first month and per year were tallied. RESULTS: The sample comprised 907 patients (674 were < 75 years old, 233 were ≥ 75 years old). 330 (36.4%) received Pembrolizumab monotherapy, and 202 (22.3%) received Nivolumab monotherapy. Over 90% of patients were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. Treatment regimens' first-month costs were 612 851-849 241 Japanese yen (JPY). The cost of standard palliative chemotherapy until 2012 was about 20 000 JPY per month. The incremental cost over the past decade is approximately 600 000-800 000 JPY per month, a 30- to 40-fold increase in the cost of palliative chemotherapy for RM-SCCHN. CONCLUSION: First-line palliative chemotherapy for RM-SCCHN exceeds 600 000 JPY monthly. Over the last decade, the prognosis for RM-SCCHN has improved, but the costs of palliative chemotherapy have surged, placing a heavy burden on patients and society.

Monovalent Omicron XBB.1.5 mRNA vaccines were newly developed and approved by the FDA in Autumn 2023 for preventing COVID-19. However, clinical efficacy for these vaccines is currently lacking. We previously established the quantification of antigen-specific antibody sequence (QASAS) method to assess the response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination at the mRNA level using B-cell receptor (BCR) repertoire assay and the coronavirus antibody database (CoV-AbDab). Here, we used this method to evaluate the immunogenicity of monovalent XBB.1.5 vaccines. We analyzed repeated blood samples of healthy volunteers before and after monovalent XBB.1.5 vaccination (BNT162b2 XBB.1.5 or mRNA-1273.815) for the BCR repertoire to assess BCR/antibody sequences that matched SARS-CoV-2-specific sequences in the database. The number of matched unique sequences and their total reads quickly increased 1 week after vaccination. Matched sequences included those bound to the Omicron strain and Omicron XBB sublineage. The antibody sequences that can bind to the Omicron strain and XBB sublineage revealed that the monovalent XBB.1.5 vaccines showed a stronger response than previous vaccines or SARS-CoV-2 infection before the emergence of XBB sublineage. The QASAS method was able to demonstrate the immunogenic effect of monovalent XBB.1.5 vaccines for the 2023-2024 COVID-19 vaccination campaign.

Although phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) represent the most robust statistical approach for answering clinical questions, they require massive expenditures in terms of time, labor, and funding. Ancillary and supplementary analyses using RCTs are sometimes conducted as alternative approaches to answering clinical questions, but the available integrated databases of RCTs are limited. In this background, the Colorectal Cancer Study Group (CCSG) of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) established a database of ancillary studies integrating four phase III RCTs (JCOG0212, JCOG0404, JCOG0910 and JCOG1006) conducted by the CCSG to investigate specific clinicopathological factors in pStage II/III colorectal cancer (JCOG2310A). This database will be updated by adding another clinical trial data and accelerating several analyses that are clinically relevant in the management of localized colorectal cancer. This study describes the details of this database and planned and ongoing analyses as an initiative of JCOG cOlorectal Young investigators (JOY).

A monovalent Omicron XBB.1.5 mRNA RBD analogue vaccine, MAFB-7256a (DS-5670d), was newly developed and approved in Japan in the Spring of 2024 for the prevention of COVID-19. However, clinical efficacy data for this vaccine are currently lacking. We previously established the Quantification of Antigen-specific Antibody Sequence (QASAS) method to assess the response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination at the mRNA level using B-cell receptor (BCR) repertoire assays and the Coronavirus Antibody Database (CoV-AbDab). Here, we used this method to evaluate the immunogenicity of MAFB-7256a. We analyzed repeated blood samples using the QASAS method from three healthy volunteers before and after MAFB-7256a vaccination. BCR response increased rapidly one week post-vaccination and then decreased, as with conventional vaccine. Notably, the matched sequences after MAFB-7256a vaccination specifically bound to the receptor-binding domain (RBD), with no sequences binding to other epitopes. These results validate that MAFB-7256a is an effective vaccine that exclusively induces antibodies specific for the RBD, demonstrating its targeted immunogenic effect.

The use of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody products like tixagevimab/cilgavimab represents an important strategy to protect immunocompromised patients with haematological malignancies from COVID-19. Although patients who receive these agents should still be vaccinated, the use of tixagevimab/cilgavimab can mask the production of anti-spike antibody after vaccination, making it hard to assess vaccine response. We have newly established a quantification method to assess the response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination at the mRNA level using B-cell receptor (BCR) repertoire assay and the Coronavirus Antibody Database (CoV-AbDab). Repeated blood samples before and after vaccination were analysed for the BCR repertoire, and BCR sequences were searched in the database. We analysed the number and percentage frequency of matched sequences. We found that the number of matched sequences increased 2 weeks after the first vaccination and quickly decreased. Meanwhile, the number of matched sequences more rapidly increased after the second vaccination. These results show that the postvaccine immune response can be assessed at the mRNA level by analysing the fluctuation in matching sequences. Finally, BCR repertoire analysis with CoV-AbDab clearly demonstrated the response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination even after tixagevimab/cilgavimab administration in haematological malignancy patients who underwent allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

We previously reported that a second dose of BNT162b2 was safe and effective for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients. Here, we investigated the safety and efficacy of a third dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in allogeneic HSCT patients. Antibody titers against the S1 spike protein were measured using the QuaResearch COVID-19 Human IgM IgG ELISA kit. The previous study included 25 allogeneic HSCT patients who received two doses of BNT162b2. Following the exclusion of three patients because of the development of COVID-19 (n = 2) and loss to follow-up (n = 1), the study evaluated 22 allogeneic HSCT patients who received a third dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2 [n = 15] and mRNA-1273 [n = 7]). Median age at the time of the first vaccination was 56 (range, 23-71) years. Five patients were receiving immunosuppressants at the third vaccination, namely calcineurin inhibitors (CI) alone (n = 1), steroids alone (n = 2), or CI combined with steroids (n = 2). Twenty-one patients (95%) seroconverted after the third dose. None of our patients had serious adverse events, new-onset graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), or GVHD exacerbation after vaccination. A third dose of the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines was safe and effective for allogeneic HSCT patients.

Anti-CD20 antibodies react with CD20 expressed not only on malignant B cells, but also on normal B cells. It has been reported that patients treated with anti-CD20 antibodies had an insufficient response to two-dose mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. To investigate the efficacy of a third dose in these patients, we investigated serum IgG antibody titers for the S1 protein after a third vaccination in 22 patients treated with the anti-CD20 antibody who failed two-dose vaccination. Results showed that overall, 50% of patients seroconverted. Although no patient who received the third dose within 1 year of the last anti-CD20 antibody administration showed an increase in S1 antibody titer, 69% of patients who received the third dose more than 1 year after the last anti-CD20 antibody administration seroconverted. Our data show that a third dose of vaccination is effective in improving the seroconversion rate in patients treated with the anti-CD20 antibody who failed standard two-dose vaccination.

BACKGROUND: Cutibacterium modestum was named in 2020. C. modestum was previously called Propionibacterium humerusii. Several implant-associated infections caused by Cutibacterium species have been previously reported, but native vertebral osteomyelitis due to these bacteria has rarely been reported. CASE PRESENTATION: A 72-year-old man, who had previously received several nerve block injections for low back pain, was referred to our hospital for deterioration in back pain in the last 1 month. MRI findings were suggestive of L5-S1 vertebral osteomyelitis. Blood cultures and bone biopsy culture revealed the presence of Gram-positive bacilli. The isolate was identified as C. modestum by 16SrRNA gene sequencing. A diagnosis of vertebral osteomyelitis caused by C. modestum was made. Minocycline followed by oral amoxicillin was administered for 3 months. His symptom improved and did not recur after treatment completion. CONCLUSION: A case of vertebral osteomyelitis caused by C. modestum was encountered. Although C. modestum is very similar to C. acnes, it could be accurately identified by 16SrRNA gene sequencing. This case represents the first documented C. modestum infection in humans.

BACKGROUND: Although COVID-19 severity in cancer patients is high, the safety and immunogenicity of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in patients undergoing chemotherapy for solid cancers in Japan have not been reported. METHODS: We investigated the safety and immunogenicity of BNT162b2 in 41 patients undergoing chemotherapy for solid cancers and in healthy volunteers who received 2 doses of BNT162b2. We evaluated serum IgG antibody titers for S1 protein by ELISA at pre-vaccination, prior to the second dose and 14 days after the second vaccination in 24 cancer patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy (CC group), 17 cancer patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICI group) and 12 age-matched healthy volunteers (HV group). Additionally, inflammatory cytokine levels were compared between the HV and ICI groups at pre and the next day of each vaccination. RESULTS: Anti-S1 antibody levels were significantly lower in the ICI and CC groups than in the HV group after the second dose (median optimal density: 0.241 [0.063-1.205] and 0.161 [0.07-0.857] vs 0.644 [0.259-1.498], p = 0.0024 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Adverse effect profile did not differ among the three groups, and no serious adverse event occurred. There were no differences in vaccine-induced inflammatory cytokines between the HV and ICI groups. CONCLUSION: Although there were no significant differences in adverse events in three groups, antibody titers were significantly lower in the ICI and CC groups than in the HV group. Further protection strategies should be considered in cancer patients undergoing CC or ICI.

Patients who have undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for hematological disease experience high mortality when infected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine in HSCT patients remain to be investigated. We prospectively evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer BioNTech) in 25 Japanese allogeneic HSCT patients in comparison with 19 healthy volunteers. While anti-S1 antibody titers in almost all healthy volunteers after the second dose were higher than the cut-off value reported previously, levels in HSCT patients after the second dose were diverse. Nineteen patients (76%) had seroconversion of anti-S1 IgG. The median optical density of antibody levels in HSCT patients with low IgG levels (<600 mg/dL), steroid treatment, or low lymphocytes (<1000/μL) was significantly lower than that in the other HSCT patients. There were no serious adverse events (>Grade 3) and no new development or exacerbation of graft-versus-host disease after vaccination. We concluded that the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine is safe and effective in Japanese allogeneic HSCT patients.

Treatment with anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibodies improves the anti-cancer immune response and can provide a meaningful clinical benefit to cancer patients. However, this treatment can result in specific autoimmune toxicities, termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Although irAEs are well recognized, the development of infectious diseases due to this treatment is not often observed. Some recent reports have indicated that patients who receive anti-PD-1 antibodies are at a higher risk for tuberculosis than others. However, reports on nontuberculous mycobacterial infection during anti-PD-1 antibody treatment are still rare. We herein report the first case of Mycobacterium mageritense infection during anti-PD-1 antibody treatment.

BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis (IE) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and successful management requires expertise in both cardiac surgery and infectious disease (ID). However, the impact of ID consultation on the clinical outcomes of IE is not clear. METHODS: The present study was a quasi-experimental, interrupted time series analysis of the clinical outcomes of patients with IE before (April 1998-April 2008) and after (May 2008-March 2019) the establishment of an ID department at a tertiary care hospital in Japan. The primary outcome was clinical failure within 90 days, defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, unplanned cardiac operation, new-onset embolic events, and relapse of bacteremia caused by the original pathogen. RESULTS: Of 238 IE patients, 59 (25%) were treated in the preintervention period, and 179 (75%) were treated in the postintervention period. Establishment of an ID department was associated with a 54% reduction in clinical failure (relative risk, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-1.02; P = .054) and a 79% reduction in new-onset embolic events (relative risk, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.71; P = .01). In addition, the rate of inappropriate IE management significantly decreased (relative risk, 0.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.22; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Establishment of an ID department at a tertiary care hospital was associated with improved management, better clinical outcomes, and reduced embolic events in patients with IE admitted to the hospital.

Capicua transcriptional repressor (CIC)-rearranged sarcoma is an Ewing-like sarcoma with an aggressive clinical course and poor prognosis. No standard treatment has been established. The present study describes a case of CIC-rearranged sarcoma with lung metastases developing in a 24-year-old woman as a therapy-associated malignancy following chemotherapy for anaplastic large cell lymphoma at nine years old. This was treated with palliative regimens used for Ewing sarcoma. The patient achieved disease control for one year. Of note, ifosfamide and etoposide (IE), which were used as a second line treatment lead to a partial response. The case described in the present study indicated that treatment with Ewing regimens is a reasonable option for patients with metastatic CIC-rearranged sarcoma, including those with a second malignant case.

Regorafenib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor which targets tumor angiogenesis, the tumor microenvironment and oncogenesis. Based on this mode of action, regorafenib has a broad spectrum of toxicities. However, at present, few reports have focused on autoimmune adverse events. We report a first case of regorafenib-induced exacerbation of chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura in remission during treatment for the patients with heavily treated advanced colorectal cancer. This case report highlights the need for caution with regard to regorafenib treatment in patients with cancer with concomitant immune thrombocytopenic purpura.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase 1 study to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended dose of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel/S-1 combination chemotherapy in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We enrolled patients aged 20 years or older with unresectable pancreatic cancer and who had not been treated with chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel were administered on days 1 and 8, and S-1 was administered orally twice daily for 2 weeks, repeated every 3 weeks. The starting dose was level 0 [gemcitabine 700 mg/m2, nab-paclitaxel 90 mg/m2, S-1 60/80/100 mg/day (< 1.25 m2/1.25-1.50 m2/ > 1.5 m2)]. Dose-limiting toxicities were determined during the first course, and a classical 3 + 3 dose finding design was planned. RESULTS: From March 2018 to October 2019, 20 patients were enrolled. At dose level 0, three of six patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities; one grade 3 skin rash on day 8, and two grade 3 or 4 neutropenia on day 8. At dose level-1 (gemcitabine 600 mg/m2, nab-paclitaxel 90 mg/m2, and S-1 50/70/80 mg/day), two of twelve patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities, all of which were grade 3 neutropenia on day 8. The most frequently observed toxicity during eight courses was neutropenia. Other treatment-related adverse events were mild. Eleven out of 19 (58%) patients achieved partial response. CONCLUSION: We defined the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended dose for combination therapy with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel/S-1 as dose level-1. Considering the observed response rate, further studies are warranted in order to determine the efficacy of this regimen (UMIN-CTR 000030007).

In 2019 later, the coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)pandemic have killed more than 1 million people worldwide. SARS-CoV2 cause severe pneumonia, the mortality is higher in cancer patients. Moreover, most of cancer patients are elderly and have other co-morbidities which are risk factors of COVID-19. It is still unclear that the relationship between anticancer treatments and COVID-19 are risk factors. Also, the fewer cancer diagnosis for cancer has suggested. The delay of cancer diagnosis will lead to presentation at more advanced stages and poor outcomes. Balancing the value of anticancer treatments with competing risks in COVID-19 pandemic is very difficult. The priorities for cancer care during COVID-19 pandemic affect cancer treatment decisions. However, anticancer treatments have the potential to cure should not be delayed. When treatment has been started, we need to consider the local healthcare system to triage the symptoms that is difficult to distinguish between COVID-19 and side effect of treatment, for example, febrile neutropenia and drug-induced pneumonitis. To continue cancer treatment, education of infection prevention and protection, not only for medical staff but also for patient, are very important.

Background

Nivolumab improves overall survival (OS) in patients with platinum-refractory recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). In one study, however, Kaplan-Meier OS and progression-free survival (PFS) curves for the nivolumab and cytotoxic agent arms crossed at 3-6 months, suggesting that patients with initial resistance to immunotherapy might have better outcomes with cytotoxic treatment. Here, we explored the conditions and candidates which are predictive of nivolumab outcomes in R/M HNSCC.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 27 consecutive R/M HNSCC patients treated with nivolumab from 2014 to 2018. Tumor size was evaluated by RECIST ver.1.1. Tumor growth rate (Gr) was defined as 3log(D₀/D_pre)/t, where D₀ and D_pre are the sum of the diameters of the target lesions (SumTLs) at baseline and pre-baseline, and t is time, with 1t defined as 4 weeks.

Results

Twenty-five patients were enrolled. Survival was significantly worse in patients with disease progression within 3 months. Outcomes appeared poorer in patients with higher pre-treatment Gr and bigger SumTLs at baseline. We therefore explored the association between prognosis, Gr and SumTLs. Recursive partitioning analysis showed that the characteristics of patients with disease progression after 3 months were Gr < 0.76 and SumTLs < 31.0 mm. Further, Gr < 0.76 and SumTLs < 31.0 mm was associated with significantly longer PFS (p = 0.01) and OS (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

These results suggest that Gr and SumTLs at baseline are significantly associated with OS and PFS in R/M HNSCC patients treated with nivolumab.