岡田 陽平 | ![]() |
オカダ ヨウヘイ | |
大学院国際協力研究科 国際協力政策専攻 | |
准教授 | |
法学・政治学関係 |
[招待有り]
[査読有り]
研究論文(学術雑誌)
[査読有り]
研究論文(学術雑誌)
[招待有り]
[査読有り][招待有り]
研究論文(学術雑誌)
[査読有り][招待有り]
[査読有り]
研究論文(学術雑誌)
[査読有り]
研究論文(学術雑誌)
研究論文(学術雑誌)
In 2013, a suit was lodged before the us District Court in ny, invoking un responsibility for the outbreak of cholera in Haiti. The outbreak is a tragedy not only because of its catastrophic consequences but because it was caused by the un peacekeeping operation. To date, however, the merits of the claims have never been examined due to un immunity. While the un Charter provides for this immunity in an equivocal manner, the specification by the cpiun allows for a straightforward determination of its content and scope. In contrast, section 29 of the cpiun, which stipulates the un's obligation to provide alternative means for dispute settlement as a counterpart of its immunity, is an interpretative puzzle. Due to discrepancies over the interpretation of the provision, the Haiti cholera case has resulted in a stalemate. Against this backdrop, the present study aims to clarify the content and scope of the obligation.
Brill Nijhoff, 2018年, International Organizations Law Review, 15 (1), 39 - 76, 英語[査読有り]
研究論文(学術雑誌)
研究論文(大学,研究機関等紀要)
研究論文(学術雑誌)
研究論文(学術雑誌)
[招待有り]
[招待有り]
[招待有り]
書評論文,書評,文献紹介等
[招待有り]
口頭発表(一般)
[招待有り]
口頭発表(一般)
[招待有り]
口頭発表(一般)
口頭発表(一般)