村井 恭子 | |
ムライ キョウコ | |
大学院人文学研究科 社会動態専攻 | |
准教授 | |
史学関係 |
論文集(書籍)内論文
[査読有り][招待有り]
研究論文(学術雑誌)
[招待有り]
研究論文(学術雑誌)
This article discusses the Tang Dynasty's management of its "frontier," especially its policy on the northern periphery through an examination of its response to the movement south by the Uighur people. Even before the Uighur began to migrate south, the Dynasty's control over the chieftainships on the northern periphery had been weakening, as both troop strength was declining and the supply of horses waning. These are the factors which determined how Tang China first responded to the southern migration of the Uighurs with a policy of appeasement (AD 840-847.7), during which the Tang Dynasty emphasized "friendly" relations with the Uighurs in its dealings with the chieftainships on the northern periphery, while treating them with tolerance as well. It was a time during which military engagement was avoided in the north for the purpose of re-militarization.Then there began a period marked by a Tang military campaign to punish Öge Kehan 鳥介可汗 (842.8-843.1), who had invaded large portions of the northern periphery in migration south. The insufficiencies in military wherewithal in terms of troops and horses were supplied from the chieftainships on the northern periphery. However, not all the chieftainships choose to cooperate. The Tang Dynasty responded accordingly by treating the anti-Uighur chieftainships of Hedong 河東 with tolerance and leeway, while adopting repressive measure stowards the northeastern chieftainships which maintained deep ties with the Uighurs.During that time, the information necessary for the Tang Dynasty to determine and implement such policies was provided by imperial couriers (zhongshi 中使) and local reporters (zoushiguan 奏事官) providing the link between the north and the Tang capital. The Dynasty's directives reached to the troops in the north were also transmitted to the northern chieftainships. These intelligence agents were also charged with surveying the rural conditions of each ethnic group in the region for the purpose of military mobilization. In the end, the Tang Dynasty's policy was successful in utilizing chieftainships on the northern periphery to block the southern migration of the Uighur people. However, later on, both the Tang Dynasty and Tubo 吐蕃 would begin to decline, therefor, it would result in the autonomy of the forces that resided on their northern peripheries of Tang China.
東洋文庫, 2008年06月, 東洋学報, 第90巻第1号、pp.33-67 (1), 33 - 67, 日本語[査読有り]
研究論文(学術雑誌)
研究論文(学術雑誌)
[招待有り]
研究論文(学術雑誌)
その他
速報,短報,研究ノート等(学術雑誌)
その他
その他
その他
記事・総説・解説・論説等(その他)
その他
その他
[招待有り]
書評論文,書評,文献紹介等
その他
[招待有り]
書評論文,書評,文献紹介等
[招待有り]
記事・総説・解説・論説等(学術雑誌)
一般書・啓蒙書
一般書・啓蒙書
学術書
学術書
口頭発表(一般)
口頭発表(一般)
[招待有り]
口頭発表(招待・特別)
[招待有り]
口頭発表(招待・特別)
口頭発表(一般)
口頭発表(一般)
口頭発表(一般)
[招待有り]
口頭発表(一般)
口頭発表(一般)
[招待有り]
口頭発表(招待・特別)
口頭発表(招待・特別)
口頭発表(招待・特別)
[招待有り]
口頭発表(招待・特別)
口頭発表(招待・特別)
口頭発表(一般)
[招待有り]
口頭発表(招待・特別)
その他
競争的資金
競争的資金
従来、魏晋南北朝の政治史は、多くの場合、正史の影響を強く受け、各王朝史の枠組みのなかで論じられてきた。本研究では、こうしたかつての枠組みではなく、より大きな歴史的な視野での東部ユーラシア史のなかでその政治史を論じ直すことを目指した。そうしたなかで、各時代において、戦争、移民、交易、文化交流などが各王朝の政治に与えた影響を具体的に検証するとともに、一見国内的な政治事件に見える事件の背後に王朝の枠を超えた多元的な世界の影響のあることを確認してきた。また、魏晋南北朝通史の新しい時期区分についても提案した。
競争的資金