INAHARA Minae | ![]() |
Graduate School of Human Development and Environment / Department of Human Development | |
Associate Professor | |
Philosophy |
[Refereed]
Scientific journal
[Refereed]
Scientific journal
[Invited]
Symposium
[Invited]
Scientific journal
[Invited]
Research institution
[Refereed]
Research institution
[Invited]
Scientific journal
Speech language pathology needs to be linked with philosophy. Those with communication impairments encounter many problems when engaging in conversation with others. Does only the speaker(s) bear the responsibility to make their speech intelligible? In order to answer this question, I suggest that a Wittgensteinian approach offers original insights into speech as an intersubjective phenomenon. By exploring my experiences of having speech difficulties due to cerebral palsy, I shall argue that the unintelligibility of my voice is not simply my failure to achieve the able-spoken standard(s) of speech, but also the failure of others to recognise my utterance as speech. I hope to offer a different account of the voice that defines the human voice as intelligible speech - one that provides a more appropriate philosophical diversity for understanding the ethics of articulation. © 2013 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
Jan. 2013, Disability and Society, 28 (1), 41 - 53, English[Refereed]
Scientific journal
[Invited]
Others
In the social system in which we live, the imaginary body is an able body. The able-bodied has established its representations that are the projection of able-bodied subjectivities. In this article, I shall develop a psychoanalytic account of physical disability in order to open up possibilities for physical disability beyond its position as castrated able-bodiedness. Psychoanalysis, to me, is not simply about 'sexuality' but can also be used to analyse 'physical disability', indeed all aspects of one's subjectivity. I shall propose the appropriation of psychoanalysis to explain the construction of subjectivity, whether it is able-bodied or disabled in a way that parallels the male/female dichotomy. Within an able-bodied symbolic, in which the able-bodied takes itself as normal, it is impossible to illustrate the multiplicity of the disabled. Following Irigaray's claim that the ambiguity of female sexuality does riot conform, to male notions of sexuality, I argue that the complexity of the disabled body does not fit into the able-bodied norm of subjectivity. In this article, I shall be drawing on Irigaray's theory of embodied subjectivity to argue against the masculine-able-bodied-based theory of subjectivity found in Freud and Lacan.
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD, Mar. 2009, BODY & SOCIETY, 15 (1), 47 - 62, English[Refereed]
Scientific journal
[Refereed][Invited]
Report scientific journal
<p>In a special care dentistry setting, there are many patients who have faced various difficulties in their day-to-day lives. In the process of administering dental treatment and promoting oral health, support for the parents who look after their children with disabilities is often necessary along with support for the patients themselves. This interdisciplinary study examined parental support from four different perspectives:special care dentistry, clinical philosophy, clinical psychology and pediatric nursing. The study was carried out by questionnaire in the Division of Special Care Dentistry at the Osaka University Dental Hospital. Both patients and their parents were asked about their psychological and family needs. Afterwards, psychological counseling sessions with 7 mothers were conducted and 18 philosophy cafés were held. In the psychological counseling sessions, it was revealed that many parents of children with disabilities had a strong desire to talk about the issues they face. In the philosophy café sessions, it was revealed that the parents benefited from discussing their experiences of looking after children with disabilities with those in a similar position. The philosophy café provided a safe environment where the parents' experiences and coping strategies for looking after children could be shared and discussed openly. Throughout the interdisciplinary study, it was found that there is a need for parental support in special care dentistry. It is paramount for all dental and medical institutions to provide a place where the parents can talk about their experiences and think about what their children need and what they as parents and caregivers need. Along with the possibility of helping to build a new support network, it was shown that feedback from patients and family members may help improve the quality of special care dentistry.</p><p>This study clarified the need for comprehensive support for patients and their families in special care dentistry, and revealed that if a satisfactory level of care is to be offered in special care dentistry, a place where the parents or caregivers can share their experiences is necessary, as is feedback from the people with disabilities. If we take the experiences of both parents and people with disabilities into account, a better support network can be provided.</p>
一般社団法人 日本障害者歯科学会, 28 Feb. 2017, 障害者歯科, 38 (1), 16‐23 - 23, Japanese精神障がいをもつ人たちを地域で支える取り組み(2)沖縄訪問研修報告
大阪大学大学院文学研究科臨床哲学研究室, 31 Mar. 2016, 臨床哲学, 17, 173 - 183, Japanese共生のための障害の哲学 : 身体・語り・共同性をめぐってPhilosophy of Disability & Coexistence : Body, Narrative, and Community論文Research Papers
東京大学大学院総合文化研究科附属共生のための国際哲学研究センター The University of Tokyo Center for Philosophy(UTCP) 上廣共生哲学寄附研究部門, Oct. 2013, UTCP Uehiro Booklet, 2, 11 - 25, JapaneseScholarly book
Scholarly book
Scholarly book
Scholarly book
Scholarly book
[Refereed]
Scholarly book
[Refereed]
Scholarly book
Scholarly book
Scholarly book
Scholarly book
General book
Scholarly book
[Invited]
Public discourse
[Invited]
Public discourse
[Invited]
Public discourse
Oral presentation
[Invited]
Others
[Invited]
Nominated symposium
[Invited]
Nominated symposium
[Invited]
Nominated symposium
[Invited]
Invited oral presentation
Oral presentation
Others
[Invited]
Nominated symposium
Nominated symposium
Public symposium
Oral presentation
Public symposium
Nominated symposium
Nominated symposium
Invited oral presentation
Oral presentation
Oral presentation
Public symposium
[Invited]
Nominated symposium
[Invited]
Nominated symposium
[Invited]
Nominated symposium
[Invited]
Nominated symposium
[Invited]
Oral presentation
[Invited]
Oral presentation
[Invited]
Others
[Invited]
Oral presentation
[Invited]
Nominated symposium
[Invited]
Nominated symposium
[Invited]
Public discourse
Japan Society of Phenomenology and Social Sciences
THE MERLEAU-PONTY CIRCLE OF JAPAN
Society for Women in Philosophy UK
The Japan Society for the Study of Adult and Community Education
日本健康教育学会
The Philosophical Association of Japan
The Phenomenological Association of Japan
THE JAPANESE SOCIETY FOR DISABILITY AND ORAL HEALTH
Competitive research funding
Competitive research funding
Competitive research funding
Competitive research funding
Competitive research funding
Competitive research funding
Competitive research funding
シンポジウム「現象学とエンパワメント」
05 Dec. 2021, zoom, 【シンポジウム】 「現象学とエンパワメント」 司会:池田喬(明治大学) 稲原美苗(神戸大学) 提題者: 石田絵美子(兵庫医療大学) 宮原優(立命館大学) 前田拓也(神戸学院大学) 現象学は社会学が関心をもつテーマを扱うときに頻繁に呼び出されてきた。ジェンダーと疾病や障害はその典型である。かつては精神疾患への現象学的アプローチが影響力をもったが、その後、精神障害に限らず、様々な疾病や障害への現象学的アプローチが試みられてきた。石田絵美子氏の『「進化」する身体: 筋ジストロフィー病棟における語りの現象学』(ナカニシヤ出版、2019年)はその最近の成果である。また、ジェンダーについても「フェミニスト現象学」が世界的に大きな研究領域となり、日本でも稲原美苗・川崎唯史・中澤瞳・宮原優編『フェミニスト現象学入門』(ナカニシヤ出版、2020年)が出版されるに至っている。 こうした展開において「現象学」に託されているのは、一人称的経験の記述だとひとまず言える。一人称的経験の記述の価値は、当然のことながら、三人称的観点からの説明的記述と同じ基準では測れない。三人称的で客観的記述と称するものの正確さではなく、むしろこれとは別の意味での記述の価値を人が現象学に認めるとき、現象学的な経験の記述には広い意味で「エンパワメント」のはたらきがあるという理解が含まれているように思われる。つまり、社会的に抑圧されたり不利な立場に置かれた人々が自らの状況を理解したり、自分自身について語るための言葉を獲得したり、以前より生活を自分でコントロールし、自分らしく生きたりできるように支援すること、そうした支援になる考え方を促進すること、などである。 学問の価値は、必ずしも正確な記述と称されるもので判定されるわけではなく、プラグマティストが考えるように、日常生活の問題を改善するという観点から評価されることもできる。その学問が無力化された人々をエンパワーするという観点から、その学問の価値を考えることも可能だろう。そもそもフェミニズムや障害学はエンパワメントの課題と密接に結びついてきたのだから、現象学が、ジェンダーや障害のテーマと関わるときにもエンパワメントの観点からその価値を再考することには意味があると思われる。 そこで本シンポジウム「現象学とエンパワメント」では、障害とジェンダーに関する現象学的研究をされている石田絵美子氏(兵庫医療大学)と宮原優氏(立命館大学)に加え、福祉社会学と障害学の研究者である前田拓也氏をお迎えし、エンパワメントの観点から見たとき現象学はどのような学問的アプローチとして現れるのかを社会学の観点を踏まえて考えたい。まず、進行性・難治性の病をもつ人々の経験を現象学的に記述することで,ステレオタイプ的な見方とは異なるその人々の姿を示してきた石田絵美子氏(兵庫医療大学)のご提題では、こうした現象学的記述がもちうるエンパワメントの可能性が考察される。次に、月経などの女性の身体経験の現象学的研究に従事してきた宮原優氏(立命館大学)のご提題では、乳児のケアの現象学的分析に行われ、それによって保育者のニーズを描出することが試みられる。最後に、前田拓也氏(神戸学院大学)のご提題では、障害者自立生活運動の実践において健常者が障害者の介助を「できるようになっていく」プロセスに注目し、このプロセスは介助する/される関係性のなかでどのように経験されるのか、それらの記述のもつ意義は何かが考察される。以上の三つの提題のあとには全体討議を通じて「現象学とエンパワメント」というテーマについての理解を深め、今後の課題を明確にしたい。 (企画実施責任者:池田喬・稲原美苗), International academic contributionCompetition etc